Notice: Function add_theme_support( 'html5' ) was called incorrectly. You need to pass an array of types. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 3.6.1.) in /customers/6/8/f/missfoodwise.com/httpd.www/wp-includes/functions.php on line 5833 Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /customers/6/8/f/missfoodwise.com/httpd.www/wp-includes/functions.php:5833) in /customers/6/8/f/missfoodwise.com/httpd.www/wp-includes/rest-api/class-wp-rest-server.php on line 1723 Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /customers/6/8/f/missfoodwise.com/httpd.www/wp-includes/functions.php:5833) in /customers/6/8/f/missfoodwise.com/httpd.www/wp-includes/rest-api/class-wp-rest-server.php on line 1723 Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /customers/6/8/f/missfoodwise.com/httpd.www/wp-includes/functions.php:5833) in /customers/6/8/f/missfoodwise.com/httpd.www/wp-includes/rest-api/class-wp-rest-server.php on line 1723 Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /customers/6/8/f/missfoodwise.com/httpd.www/wp-includes/functions.php:5833) in /customers/6/8/f/missfoodwise.com/httpd.www/wp-includes/rest-api/class-wp-rest-server.php on line 1723 Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /customers/6/8/f/missfoodwise.com/httpd.www/wp-includes/functions.php:5833) in /customers/6/8/f/missfoodwise.com/httpd.www/wp-includes/rest-api/class-wp-rest-server.php on line 1723 Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /customers/6/8/f/missfoodwise.com/httpd.www/wp-includes/functions.php:5833) in /customers/6/8/f/missfoodwise.com/httpd.www/wp-includes/rest-api/class-wp-rest-server.php on line 1723 Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /customers/6/8/f/missfoodwise.com/httpd.www/wp-includes/functions.php:5833) in /customers/6/8/f/missfoodwise.com/httpd.www/wp-includes/rest-api/class-wp-rest-server.php on line 1723 Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /customers/6/8/f/missfoodwise.com/httpd.www/wp-includes/functions.php:5833) in /customers/6/8/f/missfoodwise.com/httpd.www/wp-includes/rest-api/class-wp-rest-server.php on line 1723 {"id":1843,"date":"2016-04-02T16:00:41","date_gmt":"2016-04-02T14:00:41","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.missfoodwise.com\/?p=1843"},"modified":"2020-07-01T17:50:30","modified_gmt":"2020-07-01T15:50:30","slug":"bath-buns","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.missfoodwise.com\/2016\/04\/bath-buns.html\/","title":{"rendered":"Bath buns – or the tale of English buns #1"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"Bath-buns-regula-ysewijn--6330\"<\/a>If you have visited the city of Bath<\/a>, nestled in a green valley with its Roman baths, elegant\u00a0Georgian townhouses and impressive circus, you might have noticed that there are two famous buns in town. Both are competing to be the oldest, most authentic, and most valuable to the city’s heritage. The Sally Lunn and the Bath Bun – they both even have their own tea room in town. Of course the notion that one of these buns is more important than the other is bollocks. At the end of the day, it’s just something to spread your butter on. I’m far more interested in both of these buns history than I am in their importance.<\/p>\n

One bun maker claimed that the Bath bun was just simply a Sally Lunn which was slightly changed and then given the name Bath Bun for the tourists. A rather simplistic way of looking at it, but it has happened to other foods in the past. Of course in this case we are talking about two entirely different buns.<\/p>\n

What a difference a bun makes<\/strong>
\nWe know that during\u00a0the Great Exhibition of\u00a01851 in London, set up by Prince Albert, \u00a0934.691 Bath buns were sold to the public. This shows they were either popular, or they were the best option! According to bun legend\u00a0people remarked that the Bath bun sold in London was not exactly like the one sold in Bath and soon Bath buns in London were renamed London buns. However, mentions for London buns can be found 20 years before the Great Exhibition. So I’m fairly sure we are again talking about two different buns. To confuse things even more is that in Australia a Chelsea bun is known as a London bun.<\/p>\n

The Sally Lunn which I will get to in another posting, is a light bun with a nice dome shaped top, it looks like a brioche but is less rich and not sweet at all. It is known since 1776. The Bath bun used to be a Bath cake in the 18th century. But although it was called cake, it was definitely treated as a bun, which according to Elizabeth Raffald\u00a0The Experienced English Housekeepe<\/i>r, 1769 should be the size of a French roll and sent in hot for breakfast. Bath resident and cookery author Martha Bradley, gave a recipe in her book in 1756 entitled ‘Bath seed Cake’. Over the course of the 18th century eggs were added to the batter making the buns richer. In Andre Simon\u2019s ‘Cereals: A Concise Encyclopedia of Gastronomy’ from 1807 the recipe\u00a0instructs the cook to:
\nRub 1 lb. of butter into 2 lb. of fine flour; mix in it 1 lb. of caraway comfits, beat well 12 eggs, leaving out six whites, with 6 spoonfuls of new yeast, and the same quantity of cream made warm; mix all together, and set it by the fire to rise; when made up, strew comfits over them.<\/p>\n

Jane Austen was a fan of Bath buns and promised to stuff her face with them\u00a0if her sister Cassandra would not be joining her for a visit to Paragon that May.<\/p>\n

Your going I consider as indispensably necessary, and I shall not like being left behind; there is no place here or hereabouts that I shall want to be staying at, and though, to be sure, the keep of two will be more than of one, I will endeavour to make the difference less by disordering my stomach with Bath buns; and as to the troyle of accommodating us, whether there are one or two, it is much the same
\nJane Austen to Cassandra, 1801<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Her diary entry for 1801 shows us that by then, the Bath\u00a0cakes were known as Bath buns.\u00a0This was most definitely a bun for the rich, in the 18th century the normal folk would not be feasting on buns for breakfast, they would have to do with a plain loaf of bread. The eating of yeast leavened buns for breakfast only became something more widespread in Victorian times, when bakeries and methods became more industrialised.<\/p>\n

The Bath bun of Jane’s and Elizabeth’s time would have been quite similar, and they are quite filling, unlike the Bath buns we find in Bath\u00a0today which are more like brioche and do look more like a Sally Lunn but with toppings added. The old Bath buns or cakes contained caraway comfits and were also decorated with them. Caraway comfits had been popular in Britain since Tudor times, and were made by coating the seeds with a various\u00a0layers of sugar syrup, drying the seeds in between each layer. It was and still is if you want to try to make them today, a very time consuming task.\u00a0The Caraway comfits, along with other comfits, were often served at the end of a meal with a mulled wine to aid digestion. \u00a0The\u00a0buns were usually also coloured yellow using ‘chrome yellow’ which you could only obtain from an apothecary. That led to an unfortunate event when in 1859 a baker poisoned his customers because the apothecary had sold him arsenic by mistake.<\/p>\n

Towards the end of\u00a0the 19th century candied peel, citrus zest and\/or dried fruit, and mixed spices became popular. Todays Bath Buns are no longer made with caraway seeds or comfits, nor are they decorated with them. They are now baked with a lump of sugar in them, and decorated with sugar nibs and currants. It now looks more like a brioche like the Saly Lunn, light instead of a more dense scone-like bake. Elizabeth David said of these buns: This London Bath bun should, I believe, be distinguished from the Bath bun of Bath and the West Country, said to be still at least shapely and neatly rounded if not precisely light.\u00a0<\/em>Elizabeth David uses Elizabeth Raffald\u2019s 1769 Bath bun recipe for her book \u2018English Bread and Yeast Cookery\u2019, but\u00a0she has slightly altered the recipe, using\u00a0milk instead of cream\u00a0and topping the buns with sugar rather than caraway comfits. Helping the idea we have of a Bath bun today. Florence White gives two different\u00a0recipes for Bath buns in her \u2018Good Things in England\u2019 from \u00a01932 \u2013 one from 1904 with peel, currants and crushed sugar, and one from the early eighteenth century with sack, rosewater and caraway comfits.<\/p>\n

My recipe below is based on that from Elizabeth Raffald from 1769, only I use caraway seeds rather than caraway comfits, because I did not feel like spending hours coating seeds in sugar. When I have oceans of time some day, I will try and make caraway comfits, but for now these buns will do just as they are. Call them lazy Bath Buns. Good as ever spread with a generous amount of sweet butter, but cheddar\u00a0or gauda cheese is very nice as well. They are more like scones than they are buns, best eaten on the same day of baking them when just cooled.<\/p>\n

\"Bath-england-regula-ysewijn-2679-combo\"<\/a><\/p>\n

\"Bath-buns-regula-ysewijn--6149\"<\/a>\"Bath-buns-regula-ysewijn--6158\"<\/a>\"Bath-buns-regula-ysewijn--6166\"<\/a>\"Bath-buns-regula-ysewijn--6170\"<\/a>\"Bath-buns-regula-ysewijn--6267\"<\/a><\/p>\n

Bath Buns – old school<\/strong><\/p>\n